Do you know if I had multiple joins there would be a performance issue ?
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Michael Dykman <mdyk...@gmail.com> wrote: > Keep joining I think. In the absence of intersect (which incurs the cost > of a query per type anyhow ), this join pattern is the only option I can > think of. > > On 2012-11-22 10:01 AM, "Neil Tompkins" <neil.tompk...@googlemail.com> > wrote: > > Michael, > > Thanks this kind of works if I'm checking two types. But what about if I > have 5 types ? > > On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Michael Dykman <mdyk...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> > response did not go to the list.. >> > >> > >> > I assume that you mean the id must be associated with bo... >> >> > >> > >> > -- >> > - michael dykman >> > - mdyk...@gmail.com >> > >> > May the Source be with you. >> > >> >> > -- >> > MySQL General Mailing List >> > For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql >> > To unsubscribe... >> > >
