What specific issues are you focusing on?
DownloadFAST.com wrote: > More points about proposed wsSQL: > > 1. Another point is that any changes in a separate fork can always be > integrated back into the main fork. Nothing is stopping that. I am just > proposing some advantages as to why it shouldn't be the minor fork's > responsibility to do that. > > 2. I would not decide this any way. It would be by vote of those who were > interested to work on the project. > > 3. The ultiimate determinant of what the market wants, is to try and find > out which fork becomes more popular. I lot can be learned for both forks > from such an endeavor. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Before posting, please check: > http://www.mysql.com/manual.php (the manual) > http://lists.mysql.com/ (the list archive) > > To request this thread, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To unsubscribe, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php > --------------------------------------------------------------------- Before posting, please check: http://www.mysql.com/manual.php (the manual) http://lists.mysql.com/ (the list archive) To request this thread, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To unsubscribe, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php
