What specific issues are you focusing on?


DownloadFAST.com wrote:

> More points about proposed wsSQL:
> 
> 1. Another point is that any changes in a separate fork can always be
> integrated back into the main fork.  Nothing is stopping that.  I am just
> proposing some advantages as to why it shouldn't be the minor fork's
> responsibility to do that.
> 
> 2. I would not decide this any way.  It would be by vote of those who were
> interested to work on the project.
> 
> 3. The ultiimate determinant of what the market wants, is to try and find
> out which fork becomes more popular.  I lot can be learned for both forks
> from such an endeavor. 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Before posting, please check:
>    http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
>    http://lists.mysql.com/           (the list archive)
> 
> To request this thread, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To unsubscribe, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php
> 



---------------------------------------------------------------------
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/           (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php

Reply via email to