Thanks for the article it is definitely helpful and narrow down my choice.
Anything against the 4.0 MAX here?
|---------+---------------------------->
| | "Tyler Longren" |
| | <tyler@captainjac|
| | k.com> |
| | |
| | 02/26/2002 12:24 |
| | PM |
| | |
|---------+---------------------------->
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|
|
| To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|
| cc:
|
| Subject: Re: NuSphere v. MySQL 4
|
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
I suggest you use MySQL from MySQL AB. Progress Software (parent of
NuSphere), is having some legal troubles.
http://www.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=02/02/26/1825200
Tyler
----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 1:01 PM
Subject: NuSphere v. MySQL 4
> Hello,
>
> I'm not sure if this list is appropriate for this issue but I'll go ahead
> ask for your input anyway. We're trying to decide to choose DBMS as a
> backend of our web portal. The portal will take online orders and other
> requests from end users and this is going to be available enterprise wide
> (WAN) for approx. 19,000 employees. As Oracle license cost is getting too
> high for this purpose, I'm thinking of using MySQL instead. However, I
saw
> two different versions here (NuSphere vs. MySQL AB) and cannot decide
which
> one is better to use.
>
> Now, my questions are:
>
> 1. What would be your recommendation for me to use, what are the
advantages
> / disadvantages of using NuSphere's (or MySQL AB's) products other than
the
> different pricing here?
>
> 2. Is it true that Gemini type table from NuSphere is much better than
> other types (e.g. InnoDB). How about the installation and config
> themselves, any issues I should know about from each product? We're going
> to install it on a W2000 server on the same box as the web portal.
>
> 3. Is it safe enough to use MySQL v.4.0.1 instead of 3.23.49. How about
the
> MAX 4.0.1., is this better? Although reliability is important this
> application is not mission critical.
>
> Sorry for the many questions, but I'm really new to MySQL and I want to
> feel comfortable with it before I decide to use this. I'd greatly
> appreciate any input from all of you.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Martin
>
>
>
>
>
>
> **Disclaimer**
> This Memo and any attachments, may be confidential and legally
privileged.
> If you are not the intended recipient and have received this in
error,
> kindly destroy this message and notify the sender. Thank you for
your
> assistance.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Before posting, please check:
> http://www.mysql.com/manual.php (the manual)
> http://lists.mysql.com/ (the list archive)
>
> To request this thread, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To unsubscribe, e-mail
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Before posting, please check:
http://www.mysql.com/manual.php (the manual)
http://lists.mysql.com/ (the list archive)
To request this thread, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, e-mail
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Before posting, please check:
http://www.mysql.com/manual.php (the manual)
http://lists.mysql.com/ (the list archive)
To request this thread, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php
