Peter Lovatt wrote:
HiThere is an article on sitepoint.com about benchmarking J2EE and .NET and some controversy over the result http://www.sitepoint.com/newsletters/viewissue.php?fid=3&id=3&issue=52
If you're knowledgable about J2EE, and go read the benchmark, you see that the J2EE 'Expert' implementors did a pretty lousy job, and ended up comparing Oranges to Apples.
That being said, in my experience, MS (pre .Net, and most likely post .Net), J2EE and PHP all scale similarly when implemented _correctly_, especially for most people's needs.
Not everyone is going to be having 1000's of users per second, unless they get themselves listed on /.
If you routinely have that kind of load, it doesn't matter what technology you're using, it has to be implemented intelligently, correctly, and robustly, otherwise you'll run into problems.
In my mind, it really comes down to what toolset you and your team are most comfortable with, and how the toolset fits into your organizations overall development strategy.
That's a debate for another day and another forum ;)
-Mark
--
For technical support contracts, visit https://order.mysql.com/?ref=mmma
__ ___ ___ ____ __
/ |/ /_ __/ __/ __ \/ / Mark Matthews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
/ /|_/ / // /\ \/ /_/ / /__ MySQL AB, Full-Time Developer - JDBC/Java
/_/ /_/\_, /___/\___\_\___/ Flossmoor (Chicago), IL USA
<___/ www.mysql.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Before posting, please check:
http://www.mysql.com/manual.php (the manual)
http://lists.mysql.com/ (the list archive)
To request this thread, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php
