subselects were slated for release with 5.0 Not 4.1
P
The earliest that subselects were planned for that I know of was 3.23. Then 3.24 (during 3.23 development). 3.24 got renamed to 4.0 (I guess), and subselects didn't appear there, either. :-) Now we have them in 4.1.
I'd say that subselects are not the classic example of a feature that was completed early. :-)
Jeremy Zawodny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 06/10/2003 11:21 AM Please respond to mysql
To: "Peter J. Milanese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: Kaarel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Which database?
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 10:54:52AM -0400, Peter J. Milanese wrote:Hey Kaarel-
I've been sticking with MySQL mostly for it's support. Large community, lots of documentation, and they have a future plan (which they tend to actually complete ahead of schedule).
Wow. You must be the first person in the history of this mailing list to accuse them of getting development done ahead of time! :-) -- Jeremy D. Zawodny | Perl, Web, MySQL, Linux Magazine, Yahoo! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | http://jeremy.zawodny.com/
MySQL 4.0.13: up 7 days, processed 223,418,033 queries (351/sec. avg)
-- Paul DuBois, Senior Technical Writer Madison, Wisconsin, USA MySQL AB, www.mysql.com
Are you MySQL certified? http://www.mysql.com/certification/
-- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
