On 1/28/04 10:29 AM, <stairwaymail-mysql at yahoo dot com> wrote: > >So should we always use InnoDB over BerkeleyBD? I was >under the impression Berkeley was faster and better at >handling transactions. > >Dan >
Eermm... That's outside my scope of expertise, my experiences have been exclusively with InnoDB and before that MyISAM, and we don't do transactions. The point I was making by mentioning the transaction side of things was in response to the earlier comments that InnoDB might help the person out if they do transactions. Most mention of InnoDB comes into play when people want transactions, but it turns out InnoDB is much better at large databases than MyISAM in many many situations. All I was saying is that InnoDB isn't JUST about transactions. Best Regards, Bruce -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
