Thanks! That was what I guessed. But how to explain
"16-bit Touch" doesn't match records with "32-bit
Touch" in the keywords? It just returned all the
records with "16-bit Touch", i.e. "16-bit" seems does
count.
Thanks again!
Haitao
--- Michael Stassen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> It's expected behavior, not a bug.
>
> "16-bit Touch" is parsed as "16", "bit" and "touch".
> The first two are
> ignored because they are too short. So, this
> searches for rows with
> "touch", then selects the ones which contain your
> phrase.
>
> "16-bit" contains no words to search for, so it
> returns nothing.
>
> Michael
>
>
> Haitao Jiang wrote:
>
> > Could anyone explain why
> >
> > match (keywords) against ('"16-bit Touch"' IN
> BOOLEAN
> > MODE)
> >
> > returns results, but not
> >
> > match (keywords) against ('"16-bit"' IN BOOLEAN
> MODE)?
> >
> > Is it a known bug?
> >
> > Thanks a lot!
> >
> > Haitao
>
>
>
> --
> MySQL General Mailing List
> For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
> To unsubscribe:
>
http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Get better spam protection with Yahoo! Mail.
http://antispam.yahoo.com/tools
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
