> On Monday 24 January 2005 10:05 pm, David Shay wrote: > > Since it really isn't similar to the mfd protocols at all, I was thinking > > it might be better in mythbackend. The only issue I see with that is that > > the uPNP AV server would need to catalog and serve up not just MythTV > > video, but also MythMusic and MythVideo ultimately. Would it be a problem > > to integrate this into mythbackend, assuming you do appropriate checks for > > installation before serving up essentially the contents of musicmetadata > > and > > videometadata? > > Why's it not similar to the mfd protocols? The existing stuff (daap, > zeroconf, http, etc) are all plugins. It already contains all the music > catalog code, too, which the bakend doesn't have. > > Isaac
I'll have to look deeper into mfd -- I mainly looked at the description instead of the code. It probably is a better fit with that plugin architecture. _______________________________________________ mythtv-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-dev
