That's by design. Backwards compatability is for wimps. =)

Hmmm. OK. It is just the first time for me that a schema upgrade has done something this, er, destructive. Usually, it will add columns that old versions can ignore. But there is some value in not having obsoleted tables.

1) Is this actually "policy"?
(I couldn't work out if the smilie was for both sentences)

2) If so, when are we going to drop oldprogram, oldrecorded,
and any of the other unused tables? :-)

--
Nigel Pearson, [EMAIL PROTECTED]|"Its not easy having a good time
Telstra BI&D, Sydney, Australia      | ...
Office: 8255 4222    Fax:  8255 3153 | even smiling makes my face ache!"
Mobile: 0408 664435  Home: 9792 6998 |     Dr Frank N Furter

_______________________________________________
mythtv-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-dev

Reply via email to