Quoting Cory Papenfuss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I'm sure it is. It would be fairly easy to have *two* drivers > separately... if the contention between the two could be worked out. > Something like the bttv and btaudio drivers coexisting, perhaps? > Basically merge the cx88 and dvb together with chip contention glue... > /dev/video0 and /dev/video1 (blocking, of course).
Why don't you look at the dvb-linux documentation? There was support for analog cards in the dvb-kernel 2.4, so I have a feeling you may be able to add support for analog as well.. Ive mostly seen reference to it with DVB-C.. I don't see the DVB driver as being a bad thing.. > Transparent fallback? That sounds like a real bugger to > implement... lots of different ways to do it. Digital channels would need > to have a record of the equalent analog channel. Why don't you just get a better antenna? If your signal is that questionable you need to either use or not use it.. Coding in a fallback method would be a complete pain.. > > #5 profit ?!? (err... ooops... how'd that get in there) > Can't forget that! Maybe "geekness" fame and fortune... :) Uh.. How is profit related to any of this? Taylor _______________________________________________ mythtv-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-dev
