On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 01:19:56AM -0500, Isaac Richards wrote: > I thought there were a few other ioctl differences between versions - and > there was an ifdef for freebsd in there (which I don't know if anyone is > using or it's even valid anymore).
I'll take care of the FreeBSD thing. Why'd they do that? On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 08:33:15AM -0000, John Harvey wrote: > Yes there were other changes to the ioctl's so we do need to be careful > adding the new header file since I think code compiled with the new header > won't work with 0.1.9. If any ioctl interfces actually changed (as opposed to new one's being added), it's a bug in the driver. I don't know of any such cases. If they had, using Myth compiled for 0.1.9 would have broken when using a 0.2.0 driver. David -- David Engel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________ mythtv-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-dev
