> You seem dead against this, so I won't push it. Even if that were the case I'd like to see this continue. I've gone down this road a few times already (usually when someone would add a new field to the protocol that mythweb didn't care about, but mythweb would still need to be updated). So far I've always given up (I consider the limitation on new dependencies a large time waster plus I always lump in my secondary goal of doing the socket stuff differently).
I wouldn't recommend going into the dark and coming back with a new protocol. It would be really nice if it were planned out beforehand. -- Anduin Withers
_______________________________________________ mythtv-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-dev
