> On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 08:23:08PM -0600, Ryan A. Carris wrote: > > I honestly didn't know that you kept CVS that stable. I had always > > assumed that it was a testing/unstable version like many projects > > CVS is generally stable since all of the developers run in on their > prodcution systems. I usually update at least every few days, even > more often if something on the -commits list interests me.
I don't know about the other developers, but with a lot of my changes, I run future-CVS on my production system. My production systems are running whatever is in my CVS tree at the time and I try to "cvs update" them weekly to current CVS. So, if I'm working on a patch in my tree, I'm usually running it on my production system. For big changes such as the recent "ALL" commercial flagging method and the JobQueue, I ran those for weeks on my production setup before I committed them to CVS. Developers like to keep their own systems working so Myth CVS stays pretty stable. :) -- Chris
_______________________________________________ mythtv-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-dev
