On Monday 21 March 2005 09:16 pm, Frank Riley wrote: > Isaac Richards wrote: > > On Monday 21 March 2005 08:23 pm, andrew burke wrote: > >>Look, it's common courtesy to bring up issues I have before I go and just > >>fork the code. Forking a project can often cause lots of bad blood and > >>problems. I do appreciate what all the devs have put together, I just > >>think that things can be handled a bit differently to improve the > >> end-user experience. I never said what the developers have done isn't > >> worthwhile, but I do take issue with the way the project is being > >> managed. I offered to help improve that situation numerous times, and > >> the devs seem to have decided it isn't help they're interested in, and > >> that's their choice. But personally, I know I would be upset if someone > >> forked a project I started without at least raising the issues they had > >> for doing so. > > > > You have _not_ offered to help improve the situation. You've offered to > > help move to subversion. That's not the same thing. > > > > Are you now changing your offer? > > What Andrew is proposing would work just fine on CVS as well as subversion.
Of course is will (that's my whole point), but he's not offered to actually _do_ anything before. Isaac _______________________________________________ mythtv-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-dev
