On Wednesday 23 March 2005 02:56 pm, Matt wrote: > hmmmm... reminds me of Sony > (http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/0,aid,117910,00.asp). I think > it's a bad judgment call to write-off the feature to encode into mp3. > 98% of my music library is MP3 and the rest is AAC. I do _not_ want > to introduce another format, or have to re-rip all my CD's into Ogg or > anythings else. Is it ok to have multiple formats... sure, but why? > Audio compression formats are a dime a dozen, yet the majority of > users have no desire to switch from using MP3. Also, I have an > iPod... I don't want Ogg and I never will. Personally, this doesn't > matter to me much either way because I don't use myth to rip, but I > think it's a nice feature that any PVR with a music management plugin > should have. Why degress? Unfortunantly, I'm not a developer but can > it honestly be _that_ hard to accomplish these goals using MP3 versus > other formats? I mean, a large large percentage of open source and > commercial software over the past 3 years have been directly related > to the boom of MP3s so it doesn't seem like it's got to be that hard. > > Either way... I don't chime in much, and in all honesty, whatever you > decide I won't mind, but I just think you can't throw out the idea of > encoding into MP3's that easily.
See, you're not using a standalone system. Why couldn't you simply continue encoding your music with whatever you used previously, and not use mythmusic for that task? Your whole argument's spurious because of that. Isaac _______________________________________________ mythtv-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-dev
