On 13/06/05, Mattias Holmlund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My 2 cents on the issue... > > On 6/13/05, John Pullan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > xmtvids. Do we need multiple id's dependent on which grabber you are > > using. E.g tv_grab_uk_rt and tv_grab_uk_bleb both use different ids. > > > > The idea with the xmltv ids is that they should uniquely identify a > channel. Their behaviour is specified in rfc 2838: > > http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2838.html > > (see definition of "broadcast"). > > If everybody followed this rfc there should be very few problems. > There is of course several ways to name each channel and still follow > the RFC, but we should encourage the different grabbers to cooperate > and in my opinion, whoever is the first to provide data for a specific > channel gets to choose the xmltvid for it and everyone else should use > the same. > > By providing a list with mappings from DVB-T Channel name / ID to > xmltvid we can actually encourage cooperation. > > So I think we should only map each channel to one xmltvid and make > tv_grab_* adapt and cooperate. > > /Mattias (author of tv_grab_se_swedb) >
Does zap2it work in the same way with the standard ids ? (no clue about this service as I live in the uk) BTW I lied, and I hope to have something simple written by the end of the week :) -- John _______________________________________________ mythtv-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-dev
