In my experience (and mind you, virtually all of my Linux experience
has come from working on my mythbox), the really hard parts are the
hardware config.  Getting TV tuners, TV-out, remote control, and sound
all working and all working at the same time.  Oh, X-windows too.

Now, if you had a package that could configure most of those things
pretty well so they'd work... wouldn't you basically have a
distribution?

The initial mythtv setup process, from right after installing packages
(if you use yum or something), until you get the backend going, could
stand to be a little bit easier, (setting up the initial DB and
channels and whatnot).  It's a laudable goal, but it wouldn't fix the
area of difficulty that kicked my butt so hard.




--- Buzz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 
> 
> > LIRC won't do any good on a backend.  LIRC is for controlling the
> frontend
> (i.e. for controlling 
> > the playback of recordings/execution of plugins).  The user doesn't
> interact with the backend--
> > instead he/she interacts with a frontend ("the" frontend
> (mythfrontend) or
> MythWeb or something), > which interacts with the backend.
> 
> LIRC won't do any good on a backend?   Um... What about all those
> LIRC
> controlled IR transmitters that send signals to the cable/satellite
> boxes
> plugged into the backend ?     Aren't they controlled through
> lircd(backend)
> talking to/from other lircd's(frontend/s) though the network?  
> 
> 
> > > What about a Wizard configuration tool?... (for common
> configurations)
> > That sounds a lot like the KnoppMyth installer to me... (
> http://www.mysettopbox.tv/knoppmyth.html 
> 
> 
> Isn't KnoppMyth a "full distribution" though?  I thought there'd be a
> bunch
> of people out there who don't want the distribution, but DO want a
> simpler
> way to get it to work?    ...
> 
> Perhaps some of Knoppmyth scripts might do much of this already and
> could be
> tweaked for other non-knoppix situations but .....You know, a
> tool/script
> that ensures you meet the hardware/software requirements for the
> features
> that you desire, AND tests them.....  I'd envisage a piece of code
> looking
> something like:
> 
> ---------pseudocode---------------
> If ( user requested mater database ) then { make sure database is
> running,
> can connect, schema is up to date, is there channel data,  etc }
> If ( user requested backend ) then { can we find a tuner, can we tune
> it,
> can we receive feed from it,  can we integrate it ? , are permissions
> right,
> will backend start, any common error messages it gives?  etc }
> If ( user requested frontend ) then { is there a video-out? Can we
> connect
> an X-server to it?  Can we configure the X server?, is the database
> connection created, can we connect to it, are permissions right, will
> frontend start? etc }
> If ( we store recordings locally ) then { ask user where? Is it
> XFS/VFS/??
> Will we be sharing via NFS?  Setup NFS for the user? }
> If ( want to use a remote control ) then {  is lirc installed, is it
> running, do we get data from it, is it irw data we can understand? , 
> take
> user through lirc config/test loop , integrate into front/back end
> and test
> irxevent/irexec/etc }
> ...etc... For every possible fault/test case we can think of. ...etc
> ....
> 
> ---------pseudocode---------------
> 
> I think the important part of the tool/utility is where is fully
> TESTS the
> relevant configuration/s, and reports back to the user "successfully
> detected/configured component XXXXXXX, press NEXT to continue.."
> 
> Further comments? 
> 
> 
> Buzz.
> 
> 
> 
> > _______________________________________________
> mythtv-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-dev
> 

_______________________________________________
mythtv-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-dev

Reply via email to