On 9/16/05, harywilke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The argument breaks down somewhat for non-ROM -based games ("PC Games", as MythGame likes to call them.) I run frontends on Linux, FreeBSD, and Mac OS X. Not all of the games I have are available on all of those platforms. Nor do the pathnames necessarily agree. I could certainly set up shell scripts to hide the differences, but it would be a lot easier if I had host-specific game definitions.
Carl Fongheiser
On Sep 16, 2005, at 4:43 PM, Greg Estabrooks wrote:
>> make sense to only display the roms that are playable on the
>> particular frontend you are using at the time.
>>
>
> Currently mythgame expects all roms to be available to all frontends
> in the same directory structure.
>
That's how i have my roms setup. Same paths on all system. A
resonable assumption as it is not hard to setup and why would you
want it necessary to have local copies of roms.
The argument breaks down somewhat for non-ROM -based games ("PC Games", as MythGame likes to call them.) I run frontends on Linux, FreeBSD, and Mac OS X. Not all of the games I have are available on all of those platforms. Nor do the pathnames necessarily agree. I could certainly set up shell scripts to hide the differences, but it would be a lot easier if I had host-specific game definitions.
Carl Fongheiser
_______________________________________________ mythtv-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-dev
