Re: [mythtv] Re: Re: Ticket #255: Improved scheduling of consecutive programs with pre-roll/overrecord

Sat, 01 Oct 2005 14:03:44 -0700


On Oct 1, 2005, at 4:32 AM, Rudy Zijlstra wrote:
The reason i do not like the unexpected behaviour of soft time support, is that it significantly lowers F(amily)AF. There simply is no way to explain the resulting behaviour to them... And considering the serious extra time that is needed to solve the slippage here, soft timing simply is not resulting in predictable behaviour. Yes i understand your budget problem. I've gone to the length of using 3 back-ends, each with 2 tuners to fully solve the schedule conflicts (4 analog tuners, 2 SAT tuners).

I don't see how having the -option- of using soft time would lower the your family's acceptance of mythtv.  -No one- is talking about forcing you to use soft time.  "I don't want to use it" is not an argument against a feature which would be useful to others.

Keith

Attachment: PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
mythtv-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-dev

Reply via email to