On Wednesday 09 November 2005 07:54 pm, Wylie Swanson wrote: > I do subscribe to mythtv-dev and mythtv-cvs -- and I am happy enough with > Issac's "didn't feel like it" answer -- not that it matters. I am more > excited to see the LiveTV work done than worry about temporary sacrifice. > And I would argue that it is easier for you to "svn update -r 7738" (and > using a LiveTV working build) than it is for everyone else to fork another > branch. If you don't like a rapidly developing source tree, use stable.
I did send out a query to the other developers before breaking anything, to make sure nobody working on code in that area (Daniel, mostly) would mind, too. I didn't think the hassle of dealing with a branch was worth it for a short period of breakage. > But this is not why I am replying. > > Issac, when you say not very long? Any thoughts as to how long? A couple of > days? week? more? ;) About a week more, I'm thinking. Maybe this weekend, if I get enough time. Most of the hard stuff is done already. Isaac
_______________________________________________ mythtv-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-dev
