On Nov 9, 2005, at 5:48 PM, andrew burke wrote:
Regardless, this discussion is pointless, its Isaac's project and if he doesn't feel like making a branch, there is no reason to argue.And I would argue that it is easier for you to "svn update -r 7738" (and using a LiveTV working build) than it is for everyone else to fork another branch. If you don't like a rapidly developing source tree, use stable.People wouldn't have to fork, only Isaac would have had to work in his ownbranch for doing that stuff. Once it was done, he could merge it back into the main trunk and everyone else could continue to work without jumping through hoops.Issac, when you say not very long? Any thoughts as to how long? A coupleof days? week? more? ;)I've read ahead to Isaac's response of a week. A breakage for a day mightnot have necessitated a branch, but a week of brokenness seems like it might have been a good thing to compartmentalize. Pulling a branch is pretty easy: svn copy svn+ssh://.../trunk svn+ssh://.../livetvbroken and then the merge would have been: svn merge svn+ssh://.../livetvbroken svn+ssh://.../trunk Doesn't seem all that difficult to me.
Geoff
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ mythtv-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-dev
