On Monday 19 December 2005 14:46, Todd Tidwell wrote: > Just "No?" I realize that this is your baby, but that has to be one of the > rudest and most abrupt answers I have ever received from anyone in answer > to a question about group development project. > > First off, this software is fantastic. One of the things that makes it > fantastic is that it is very configurable and very easy to make it behave > like each user requires or prefers. To just suddenly nix a piece of > functionality because you don't agree with it, especially without some > discussion or explanation is incredibly unjust.
I've already explained why on the lists several times, I don't see why I should have to continue repeating myself to every person who starts whining about livetv taking "more" disk space now. > Lastly, being a software developer myself for 15 years, I know that all > software benefits the most by making it accessible for the broadest range > of users. The easy, simple, correct way to do that is to allow options and > to allow multiple configurations. > > Does anyone else think that it would be too hard to make this optional or > to create a quicker auto-expire functionality to the LiveTV Recordings? If > you have information that direction, then I'll even write the patch if you > can point me in the correct direction. And I'll reject any such patch. LiveTV's staying the way it is. You already have the option to auto-expire them after a day, anyway. Isaac
_______________________________________________ mythtv-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-dev
