On Monday 09 January 2006 00:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 22:27:21 -0600 > From: Kevin Kuphal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Steve Hodge wrote: > >On 1/9/06, Kevin Kuphal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>I agree and I think he should take the time to make a similar > >> evaluation of the latest code rather than spending time on things > >> that have already been addressed > > > >Unfortunately most people are not able to run a development version of > >MythTV. They only have one system with capture cards and that system > >must be as stable as possible as it is essentially a production > >system. > > Actually most people can. Myth is a very stable product in the SVN > branch compared to other projects I've used. > > *cough* Anyone who had other people depending on the operation of the > box would have had a difficult time explaining that LiveTV was broken > for weeks because the lead developer did the work on the mainline > instead of a branch. (And if your next move is to say, "But LiveTV > isn't what Myth is about!", then why did Isaac spend so much time > rewriting it?) > > Sure, Isaac presumably had his reasons for doing the work on the > mainline, even though it was a matter of some controversy even to > other developers.
I asked the other developers _first_. None cared if I disabled it. Don't lie. Isaac
_______________________________________________ mythtv-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-dev
