> And that is just the interpretation of the people at GNU who originally
> wrote it.  However, that may have been their intention, but the way it reads
> can easily be interpreted the way I interpret it, and if it were taken to
> court, there is a good chance that that interpretation would be accepted.  A
> license agreement is interpreted by the courts (if challenged) in the way the
> court chooses :)
> 

in contract formation law, a court is supposed to construe ambiguous
terms against the grantor as they are in the better position to clear
ambiguities from the outset.
_______________________________________________
mythtv-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users

Reply via email to