Agreed. In posting that, I didn't mean to be doing any scaremongering. I mostly found it to be usefull information on the DVI spec.
I don't at all think that people should shun nvidia and buy only ati cards for dvi now, indeed, I think nvidia cards have better drivers, and thus may be a better option. If you're planning a setup with long cable runs and/or high resolution, you might look for an nvidia card with an external dvi chip, as they seem to be better than the one in the gpu. Another thing that may affect things is how good the chip in the display is at decoding a bad signal. -Nate On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 23:53:14 +1100, Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 10:35:16PM -0800, nate s wrote: > > While that's true, that all of the eye diagrams showed were ok, the > > ones with the on-chip nvidia were shown at 141mhz, because they were > > not compliant at 162mhz. This of course only matters at very high > > resolutions. > > ... and on long cables. They didn't say how they looked at 162 MHz. > They may still have been just fine, if technically out of spec. > > > Hamish > -- > Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > _______________________________________________ > mythtv-users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users > > >
_______________________________________________ mythtv-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
