Michael J. Lynch wrote:
Preston Crow wrote:

On Mon, 2004-12-20 at 14:56, Michael J. Lynch wrote:


Other than cost, is there any reason to choose a PVR250 over a pchdtv
hd3000 since the latter can MPEG2 encode both NTSC and ATSC?


You need to go back and do some more research, as the HD-3000 doesn't
MPEG encode anything.  (ATSC is broadcast as MPEG, so no encoding is
required by the recipient.)  Most HD-3000 users also use a PVR-250 card
for NTSC.

Check the list archives.



That's not what the pcHDTV website says. It specifically states that the card
MPEG2 encoding. See the second line of paragraph 2 of the following link:

HD-3000 at pcHDTV <http://www.pchdtv.com/hd_3000.html>

The line I'm referencing is:

"The card receives NTSC and ATSC Signals and converts them to
digital streams which are transported across the PCI bus."

I know that ATSC is already MPEG2, does this possibly mean that
NTSC is converted to some digital format that is something other
than MPEG2?

Yup! Digital != MPEG2. It's raw YUV data, not compressed.

I can attest that neither the HD-2000 nor the HD-3000 contains MPEG compression hardware. For NTSC, they are simply dumb frame grabber cards.

-Doug

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
mythtv-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users

Reply via email to