I find it strange for an open source project with a plugin architecture would prohibit discussion of certain plugins. Of course if it's just because it hasn't been approved by whatever approval process there is that's a different thing.
Donavan Stanley wrote:
On Fri, 04 Feb 2005 07:44:49 +0000, Paul Woodward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think Isaac, especially in light of NYC artical and similar slurs, wants to keep this project and associated records (such as this list) squeaky clean so that noone ever has a cause to legislate against this kind of project.
It's ALWAYS been the position that discussion about that plugin was not welcome on the mythtv lists. It has nothing to do with the NYT article.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ mythtv-users mailing list [email protected] http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
_______________________________________________ mythtv-users mailing list [email protected] http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
