On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 15:57 -0500, Joseph A. Caputo wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 February 2005 15:29, Ian Forde wrote:
> > On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 13:10 -0500, Joseph A. Caputo wrote:
> > > The cable companies are not required to provide HD resolution on the 
> > > Firewire output.  Most likely any HD content will be transcoded 
> > > inside  
> > > the cable box to, say, 480p before it's output over Firewire.  As 
> > > for  
> > > viewing, that's totally independent of your cable box/Firewire 
> > > setup.   
> > > Since the recording are probably not going to be HD anyway, it 
> > > really  
> > > doesn't matter that you're going to be viewing them on a standard 
> > > TV. 
> > 
> > Except that the recording that I'm getting IS HD.  People over on
> > avsforum have been capturing HD, unencrypted, over firewire since at
> > least October of 2003.  And it's not just 480p.  I've been getting 
> > 1080i 
> > and 720p.
> > 
> > I'm wondering why you think my experience is not the norm...
> 
> Right now you're getting some HD resolutions, but AFAIK the cable co. is 
> not *required* to give you anything higher than HD, as long as the 
> content is viewable.   It's entirely possible that the cable company 
> could even change this behavior on your current STB with a stealth 
> firmware upgrade.  Unencrypted broadcast televsion cannot be 
> down-sized; not sure if that applies to broadcast channels carried by a 
> cable provider. 

AFAIK, since the regulation is meant for cable companies, it would seem
that unencrypted broadcast television that they can't downsize it.

Now, it may be a different story for ESPN, HBO, etc., but aren't the
broadcast television channels (which can't be downsized by them)
generally a subset of OTA HD anyway?

        -I

_______________________________________________
mythtv-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users

Reply via email to