On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 11:36 -0500, Cory Papenfuss wrote: > That's what I thought. I'm happy with the results, but the > annoyance of getting everything right is definately beyond the scope of > what most people are willing to deal with.
Perhaps. Certainly not for the "out of the box" crowd, but that's not to say that somebody can't fill the gap between a pile of hardware and an out of the box solution including the transcoder. Certainly should not allow for somebody to muck with modelines and such, but a product could loom here. > It was also pointed out to me > a few months ago that my circuit wasn't completely accurate. I use a > 3.58Mhz crystal to generate the color subcarrier, but in reality it should > be line-locked to the horizontal sweep frequency. :-) If you say so. > That's one of the > modifications I'd like to do (with all my free time... hahaha!) Hear ya brother. I meant to ask. The picture looks properly overscanned? i.e. you are not seeing all 7??x48? (forget what res you said you have your modeline at) pixels right? Just the ones that would normally show up on a real broadcast -- missing that certain percentage of those around the border. b.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ mythtv-users mailing list [email protected] http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
