> I'd definitely go > 500, since you don't even need a splitter to get both tuners fed (the signal > is split internally).
Jarod, can you elaborate on this? Does this mean that if I want to use both of the tuners I can run a single RG6 cable to one of the inputs, then it'll split the signal off to the other tuner on the card itself? Matt On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 13:50:32 -0800, Jarod Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday 23 March 2005 12:32, Dan Littlejohn wrote: > > Anyone have any experience about which way to go on this? The price > > is fairly simular when you consider the 500 has two tuners. Any > > advantages, gotchas to decide whether to buy two pvr150's or one > > pvr500? > > With the 500, you need an extra header thingy to use multiple svideo or > composite inputs, so it may effectively take up as much space as a pair of > 150s. However, if you're just looking to use the tuners, I'd definitely go > 500, since you don't even need a splitter to get both tuners fed (the signal > is split internally). Both my 150 and 500 work equally well now. > > -- > Jarod Wilson > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Got a question? Read this first... > http://catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html > MythTV, Fedora Core & ATrpms documentation: > http://wilsonet.com/mythtv/ > MythTV Searchable Mailing List Archive > http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/mythtv/ > > > _______________________________________________ > mythtv-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users > > > > _______________________________________________ mythtv-users mailing list [email protected] http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
