Right now, I'm using an MX440. That chip seems good on my other back-end, and I had nothing but problems when I used a TNT2 a few years ago with freevo (until I got the 440). Are you using your diskless system as a backend and frontend, or just frontend?
Thanks, Norman Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > What video card are you using? > > I believe that the video card (chip) could have quite an effect. I am > using a Pentium 1.8 and a FX5200 video card and have excellent > diskless performance. The diskless machine has no hard drive in it at > all and runs well. As a data point, I also have a AMD 3200 (backend) > with a very old TNT2 and it is very slow when I use a frontend on it. > > I would vote for the extra memory. > > Dan > > > On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 11:54:08 -0700, Norman Lyon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've seen from time to time folks talking about using a diskless setup, but > I'm > > having problems seeing what their results are like. I just set up an old > piece > > of hardware to see if I could do it (since the spare hard drive I have is > VERY > > noisy). It appears to work as a front-end, but it's slow when skipping > ahead > > or back. This also could be due to the fact that I'm playing back 720x480 > on > > an Athlon 650. > > > > Does anyone have performance data to provide on their diskless setups? If > I > > were to rebuild to a Celeron D 2.5G and add a 878 grabber, would I still be > > able to use this diskless setup and be happy with performance as both > front-end > > and a diskless backend (streaming to my other backend/database/etc)? > > > > For my config's sake, my primary backend is providing the NFS root image, > and > > I'm using the noisy hard drive to provide the etherboot zlilo image to > netboot > > off a PCI NIC (the on-board NIC is too flaky to use). If I don't want swap > > space or anything else on the hard drive, and I'm running XFCE (stripped > debian > > build) is 256MB enough, or should I keep it at 512MB just to be safe? Or > is > > there a good reason why I should throw swap onto the noisy drive and just > hope > > that the 'hdparm -S' timeout keeps the drive dpun down (with either 256 or > > 512MB)? > > > > Thanks, > > Norman _______________________________________________ mythtv-users mailing list [email protected] http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
