-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Tony Godshall wrote:
> According to Will Dormann, > >> Graham Dunn wrote: >> >>> The problem here isn't so much the samba/nfs decision as the >>> wireless. In my experience, nfs handles the packet loss you see >>> in wireless connections much more poorly than SMB does. >> >> I'm no expert on the subject, but from what I've read if you set >> up NFS to use TCP rather than UDP, it can handle poor quality >> network connections better. > > > Here's a question- given wireless' packet loss issues, why mount a > remote drive at all? Surely one of the streaming protocols would > do a better job. > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > _______________________________________________ mythtv-users > mailing list [email protected] > http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users I totally agree here, using RTSP would be great in MythTV. I saw an article posted here a while ago from someone saying they'd installed vlc and how that would help performance to a remote front end. How, I have no idea because you're mapping a smb/nfs share to your local system! How's that going to improve performance? Dave -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCWNm/Tvi0LnvdKq0RAgPgAKCibG7lc/2i6I9u5EG0oEtBZuCOOACfQOJC hkdwerWdIHBp7tt2zUY6QK8= =BC2T -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ mythtv-users mailing list [email protected] http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
