Yes mate, I did. I read them all and try to understand them. I don't know the code at all, so its awkward but few if any of the commits referenced bug numbers so I had no idea they were in relation to bug fixes.
Honestly dude, I don't want my comments to be taken as negativity or anything. I love myth, I respect yours and the devs work very, very much and I thank you for it.
I was merely expressing my concerns and by the sounds of it, I don't need to be concerned.
Cheers,
Dave
On 4/17/05, Isaac Richards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Saturday 16 April 2005 03:59 am, David Whyte wrote:
> My major concern from watching the commits list was the flurry of activity
> the week or two running up to the release. It seems to happen everytime and
> while I don't want to dis the devs and contributers, it does make it a
> little dangerous to upgrade to the latest release as soon as it is
> released.
>
> Perhaps a better apporach would be to have 'code-freezes' that occur a week
> or two prior to an expected release, and then only fixes to the current
> release are commited, no new features. Perhaps with the branching of the
> source each release, this isn't so necassary, its just I wonder how stable
> *everything* is.
>
> As I said, the devs do a great job, I just don't want to lose any of the
> great MythTV functionality for the whole period between a release.
Did you bother looking at what the 'flurry of commits' were at all? Nothing
went in that was not a bugfix or an extremely minor change for at least a
week.
Isaac
_______________________________________________
mythtv-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
--
GMAIL is 'da bomb baby....YEAH
I have GMail invites, if you want one, email me direct.
_______________________________________________ mythtv-users mailing list [email protected] http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
