And i totally posted this in the wrong thread. Ignore me.
On 6/14/05, Justin Popa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For those who didnt see my post from earlier, I am back to using > another repository for the at-stable information. > > http://mirrors.ircam.fr pub/atrpms/fedora/3/en/i386 at-stable > > This should be a near perfect mirror. It's working 100% for me right > now. Don't mean to say avoid atrpms, but until this issue is resolved, > this will work for most of you. > > I've noticed about 2-3 people say they were comcast. Anyone here > having the problem on an ISP **OTHER** than comcast? > > On 6/14/05, Chris Pinkham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Maybe I'm thinking about this all wrong, but is there a way to > > > auto-expire by priority rather than by age, or otherwise configure my > > > recording schedules to achieve this effect? > > > > Don't think there's a way to do this right now. It'd be fairly easy > > to implement though. When I created AutoExpire, I created a method > > called AutoExpire::FillExpireList(). This method checks the current > > AutoExpireMethod and calls the appropriate function to get the list > > of recordings to autoexpire. Currently the only method is oldest first > > and uses AutoExpire::FillOldestFirst(), but you could easily add a > > AutoExpire::FillLowestPriorityFirst() and add code to store the > > original recording priority with a recording so it could be used to > > AutoExpire. I figured people would want other methods so I tried to > > make the code flexible, but noone ever implemented any other expiration > > ordering methods and I think the setup option for selecting the method > > has been taken out of the setup screen recently because of this. My > > drive never seems to fill up enough to have AutoExpire kick in, but if I > > did use it, I know I'd prefer "Lowest Priority First" rather than > > "Oldest First". If I didn't care that much if it recorded to begin with, > > why would I want it to stick around when something else I cared about more > > got expired just because it was older? :) > > > > -- > > Chris > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > mythtv-users mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ mythtv-users mailing list [email protected] http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
