On 08/21/05 15:49, Matt Stocum wrote:

On Aug 21, 2005, at 3:43 PM, Nick wrote:

XV support on the PVR350 is coming along well now, and should (and
already is I think) to start  to offer very good quality interlaced TV
Output. Native MPEG2 ouput, esp from LiveTV and recordings, have
excellent quality, easily surpassing my ATI card's output.

The MythTV docs (which do seem to be rather out of date with regards to the PVRx50) state that frame buffer based output on the PVR350 puts quite a load on the CPU. Is this still true, and if so is it high enough that I might have trouble running MAME or snes9x?

The MythTV docs specify information regarding the current "stable" release of IvyTV--version 0.1.9. All the information they give is completely correct--framebuffer-based output takes a lot of CPU--but if you choose to use the "unstable" versions of IvyTV--version 0.2.0-rc3(whatever) or 0.3.6(whatever), you may (should) use the Xv support that John added. If you're using Xv support, video on the PVR-350 is basically as processor-intensive as video on a "real" video card using Xv support (but takes more processor than using XvMC--which you should only need for high-def, which the PVR-350 can't do). However, OpenGL is not (and cannot be) supported on the PVR-350 (since it has no 3D acceleration in the hardware).

Mike
_______________________________________________
mythtv-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users

Reply via email to