On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 02:56:09PM -0700, Blake wrote: > Just--wow. And you managed this on an AMD 2500?
Yes, this was over 2 years ago though. Myth performed about 20% faster back then. HD takes almost nothing to record (about 7% CPU for 4 HD streams, including software raid 0). Playback would put the CPU near 100% if I had de-interlacing going on a 1080i stream. Myth's playback has received lots of good code to make video more smooth, handle seeking, time stretching and other features. This did have the result of needing more horsepower to watch the same video clip. Mplayer and MythTV had the near CPU usage to view a stream -- You can easily see this is no longer true. --Brandon
_______________________________________________ mythtv-users mailing list [email protected] http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
