[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   >>I found a kludgey way around it by forcing my recording to run 15 minutes 
over which rescheduled the
   >>second show onto the other card.

This "kludgey" way is the way you're supposed to do this. If you need to over-record for a rule, set the over-record on /that/ rule and the scheduler will honor it. If you need it on all rules, set it on all rules.

Is there a fast way to do this?
Not using the GUI. You could quickly do it using the database (but be careful and make a backup and all the other required disclaimers).

   >> Maybe this and part 1 above could be added to the scheduling
   >>algorithm in the next version.

Search the archives. This has been discussed to death. Some devs (Chris Pinkham/Bruce Markey?) even went to the trouble of writing code to allow "hard" pre-/post-roll values, but the limited feedback they received combined with the extra problems it created seemed to be enough to cause them to table the issue.

Can you provide a more-specific pointer?  I'm having a hard time
finding this particular discussion in the archives; presumably I'm
not using whatever terminology was being used.
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/mythtv/dev/152491#152491

Please read *all* the posts in the thread to make sure you understand what's happening.

Oh, and apologies to David Engel for my mis-assigning credit in my previous post.

It seems we're more likely to get a "default recording settings" that would provide a "template" to use when creating a new rule (i.e. allows you to set the default to include start early/end late values other than 0).

That would certainly be nice.  In particular, I'd like to say, by
default, "pad -every- recording by 2 minutes with a pre- and
post-roll."  I don't see any way of doing this; it seems that
I have to specify it for every program I pluck out of the program
guide, or for every recording rule I make.  It'd be nice if it
could inherit some default values.  (If there's some easy way
to do this, then I've missed it; can anyone enlighten me?)
Right. As I said, "we're more likely to get" (implying future tense) and "would provide" (subjunctive tense, indicating it is not fact, but possible). My *guess* is that when/if we get this it will be from David Engel (creater of the playback groups) or some user who decides to help David out. :)

Mike
_______________________________________________
mythtv-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users

Reply via email to