On Wednesday 11 January 2006 16:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:31:36 -0500 > > From: "Michael T. Dean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > The 150 is a better card (it even has a potential to give a better > > picture quality than the 250) and saves you money. > > bmayland (CC'ed) started a thread on 15 June 2005 showing dramatic > differences in sharpness between the two cards, with the 250 winning. > He also said he'd do some more experimentation; Bryan, did you come > up any any further results? (I'm particularly interested in RF-in, > but I also use composite-in.) > > Also, ivtv can't do NTSC sliced VBI closed-captioning on the 150/500 > yet, because Hans and the rest of the ivtv crew haven't been able to > reverse-engineer that part so far. The 250/350 do it just fine. > > (If the sharpness and CC differences between the 250/350 series and > the 150/500 series get resolved, then my next purchase will be a 500, > but until then, I'm going to waste PCI slots and get 250's since > they'll work better for me. Assuming, of course, they're still being > made at that point---I sure hope so.)
is the sharpness issue with the tuner or do the svideo/component inputs have the same issue? -- Steve _______________________________________________ mythtv-users mailing list [email protected] http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users
