I'd sure would love to write some code for it to use it with the 65c02
board. I'm having great fun programming the IDE board right now and love a
challenge.
I'm a beginner too though... So results might be a tad slow :-)

Bye,
Fabio
On Apr 28, 2014 1:22 PM, "David Fry" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Andrew,
>
> Thanks for looking at the schematic changes,just wanted to make sure I
> hadn't introduced any errors. The design rule checker doesnt report any
> errors so should be ok to go to prototype. (Changed 15pin Dsub connector
> for 2 x 8 IDC as per Console I/O + Lava10 boards)
>
> So, is anyone else out there interested in being involved in a prototype
> run of the S100 uPD7220 GDC board ?
>
> As John has already pointed out this will involve many hours of coding to
> make the board functional, so this may be one for those who like a
> challenge :-)
> If no none steps forward in the Z80 camp then I will happily take on the
> Z80 coding but results will be slow as I am relearning my Z80 asm after 30
> years away, but maybe others out there might be interested in writing code
> for other processors ???
>
> Just trying to guage the level of interest at the moment and work out a
> way forward.
>
> I have attached a zip of the KiCad files (modified for 2 x 8 IDC monitor
> connector)
> I'm using KiCad build (2013-07-07 BZR 4022)-stable
>
> your comments and feedback please
>
> Regards
>
> David Fry
>
> On Saturday, April 26, 2014 5:56:07 PM UTC+1, monahanz wrote:
>
>>  I think we need to do a prototype run on that board first.  While it
>> contains elements of 3 previous boards we did,  it is the first time they
>> are all put together in one place.  Also as a few of us know, we had real
>> problems with that BT478 chip on the VDP board (which itself BTW needs to
>> have another prototype run).
>>
>>
>>
>> On the 7220 I will help out with the hardware, the thing to remember
>> about the 7220 is you have to do quite a bit of software writing to get it
>> to be of any use.   Is somebody prepared to do that. Because without
>> software that chip/board  is useless.
>>
>>
>>
>> John
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On
>> Behalf Of *David Fry
>> *Sent:* Saturday, April 26, 2014 7:40 AM
>> *To:* [email protected]
>> *Subject:* Re: [N8VEM-S100:3295] S-100 boards in work
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi Ed,
>>
>>
>>
>> Andrew has uploaded the EDA files for the uPD7220 GDC this afternoon, if
>> you feel inclined to do a production run then put me down for 1 board
>>
>> just for curiosity value. It might be worth considering a smaller run of
>> 5 to 10 boards as this board has failed to spark sufficient interest for a
>> production run
>>
>> before. looking a previous forum posts for the uPD7220 GDC it would
>> appear to be a descendant of the ECB uPD7220 graphics board interfaced to
>> the S100 bus and is ripe for testing.
>>
>>
>>
>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/n8vem-s100/upd7220/n8vem-s100/
>> KNTuzzAdKbU/XIY-yZTK4dUJ
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>>
>>
>> David Fry
>>
>>
>> On Friday, April 25, 2014 11:19:04 PM UTC+1, Edward Snider wrote:
>>
>>  It does seem like it would be an interesting board for an S100 system.
>>
>>
>> With almost all of the work done it would be a shame not to go through to
>> completion.
>>
>>
>>
>> Unfortunately I don't have enough of a system together to help in
>> testing, but I can chip in a bit
>>
>> for prototypes.  I'd also be willing to handle the production run if we
>> can get takers for at least
>>
>> 20 boards, if that would be helpful.
>>
>>
>>
>> Ed
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, September 24, 2013 1:45:38 AM UTC-5, nekonoko wrote:
>>
>> Hi Andrew,
>>
>> I can definitely see chipping in at least some of the cost. I find the
>> uPD7220 GDC interesting as several business class CP/M systems used it for
>> graphics (DEC Rainbow, QX-10 etc.).
>>
>> Thanks much,
>>
>> Pete
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "N8VEM-S100" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "N8VEM-S100" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"N8VEM-S100" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to