I'd prefer to order this board as it is (or with minor changes like #1)
and then design a "new" board for option #3.

Todd

* John Monahan <[email protected]> [140602 12:05]:
> OK, OK there  seems to be grown swell for a V2 of this board.  We have three 
> choices:-
> 
> We can tweak the layout, correcting little things like when the LED come on 
> and what they represent – currently not really useful. 
> 
> Also allow the board to function as a “slave of a slave” with the Z80 a 
> master and a 80286 (or 80386) as a slave and a few other minor things.  
> 
>  
> 
> We could probably squeeze in a more extensive master slave chip arrangement 
> (it will be tight) like the 80286 such that the board itself as a slave could 
> call another sub-slave (or DMA controller).
> 
>  
> 
> Or we could redo the complete board and move it up to a 68020.  The 68020 had 
> one neat feature, you could dynamically choose the bus size you want—8, 16, 
> or 32 bits with two external pins on the chip.   This for example allowed you 
> to use a single boot ROM instead or 2 (or 4) as was the case in the with 16 
> bit wide systems.  They also picked up on the Intel idea bus buffering by 
> using an efficient "cache". The cache in the 68020 was only 256 bytes deep 
> and works a little differently from the 8086 queue. If a jump occurs to a 
> point in the queue, the queue was flushed and reloaded. But the cache looks 
> just like memory, so a jump to a point in the cache would not cause the cache 
> to be dumped and re­loaded. If loops are small enough, they can execute 
> directly from the cache.
> 
>  
> 
> The second two upgrades would definitely require one (or more prototypes), 
> and realistically would not get out until Autumn for #3,  probably August for 
> #2.
> 
>  
> 
> What do you guys think.
> 
>  
> 
> John
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
> Behalf Of Edward Snider
> Sent: Monday, June 2, 2014 7:27 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [N8VEM-S100:3893] Re: Possible run of S100 V3 68000/68010 CPU 
> boards
> 
>  
> 
> Sure Ian, you are down for 2 boards.
> 
>  
> 
> We have enough interest that there will definitely be a run once the updates 
> are made to the board.
> 
>  
> 
> Update on who wants boards...
> 
>  
> 
>  1. Fabio Battaglia       -           3
> 
>  2. Paul Birkel             -           1
> 
>  3. Todd Goodman     -           3
> 
>  4. Brian Marstella       -           1
> 
>  5. Jerry Brumble         -           2
> 
>  6. Gary Kaufman       -           2
> 
>  7. Andrew Bingham  -           1
> 
>  8. Matt Turner                        -           2
> 
>  9. Yoda                      -           1
> 
> 10. Andrew Kwan                  -           1
> 
> 11. Ian May                 -           2
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Total:   19
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> 
> On Monday, June 2, 2014 8:40:52 AM UTC-5, Ian May wrote:
> 
> Hi Ed,
> 
> Could you put me on the list for 2 of the updated 68000 boards please?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Ian.
> 
>  
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "N8VEM-S100" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "N8VEM-S100" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"N8VEM-S100" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to