The 16MB Static RAM board sent out to many people earlier in the year seems 
to have worked fine – at least I have heard of no problems with it.
One thing that I did not like about that  16MB static RAM board was the 
need for the two mezzanine boards.  While *the board works absolutely fine* 
with any CPU I used with it (even our 80386 CPU board),  it is a tight fit 
in the S100 box. Also dare I say, it does not look pretty!   
Putting eight CY62167DV30 static RAM chips directly on an S100 board would 
be both difficult to fit and risky in terms of SMD soldering for many users.   
With the advent of the newer AS6C3216 (4M X 8bit) static RAM chips, 
soldering 4 chips on a board becomes more practical.   

I rearranged the board so it can now be configured as a S100 bus 8MB board 
using the CY62167 chips or 16MB using the AS6C3216 chips.   This BTW, was 
the suggestion of Dave back earlier in the year.  While the 74LSxx chips 
have changed little,  the top half of the board had to be completely 
re-routed to accommodate the 4 SMD chips.  See here for a picture of the 
board:-

http://s100computers.com/My%20System%20Pages/16M%20RAM%20Board/16MG%20RAM%20Board.htm#A
 
Second Prototype 16MB Static RAM Board

(bottom of the page).

 Anyway I checked out a prototype which seems to work  fine for 8MG with 
our 80386 board using the 80386 monitor RAM test and 2Mx8 chips.   Because 
it is a prototype, I have not yet tried the 4MX8 (16MB) configuration.

This is an expensive board using expensive chips (each 4MX8 costs $21), I 
do not expect many would be interested in getting a bare board like this,  but 
since I will be ordering 4 production boards for myself (gold fingers etc), 
 I will open the order up for a day or two for anybody else that would like 
one.   

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"N8VEM-S100" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to