I would be good for 1 board. On Wednesday, June 17, 2015 at 3:20:50 PM UTC-8, Gary Kaufman wrote: > > I'm hoping to have enough interest to justify another run of the 8086 > S-100 board that John did a few years ago. > > Thanks to John's help I have files for a slightly updated version of the > board on www.s100computers.com > > - improved and corrected silk screening > - the ability to use three options for the TO-3 regulator as per the > other new boards > > > Per John's comments, the other limitation: > > "the design of that board was my very first S100 bus slave CPU board. It did > not really have the master/slave circuit flushed out properly. It's > absolutely fine as a slave but if setup as a bus master it would have to be > modified to pass control to another slave. (Its address, data, status & > control lines would have to be inactivated by the slave when it has control) > The IEEE-696 is unclear who does this, but normally the bus master > inactivates its own lines. Except for the similar 8088 our other CPU boards > have the appropriate circuits." > > Please let me know of any interest - hopefully we can get a run together. > > (I'll also price it out thru PCBWAY given Don's recent posting) > > - Gary > >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "N8VEM-S100" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
