I hope this is what your asking for.
Hostextinfo.cfg format:
# Windows Servers
define hostextinfo{
host_name servername
icon_image win40.gif
statusmap_image win40.gd2
}
Host.cfg format:
# 'servername' host definition
define host{
use generic-host ; Name of host
template to use
host_name servername
alias servername
address X.X.X.X
parents switch
check_command check-host-alive
max_check_attempts 10
notification_interval 120
notification_period 24x7
notification_options d,u,r
contact_groups sys-admins
}
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Perrin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 4:37 PM
To: Pete Shelfo
Cc: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Nagios 2.0 Logos and Icons Missing
>
> I recently built a new 2.0 server to run parallel with my 1.1.
Everything
> is working on the new 2.0 except I have no logos in status map or on
the
> host definitions as I did with 1.1. I copied over all the config
files and
> everything looks to be fine. My nagios.cfg and cfi.cfg have the
correct
> statements, the logos are located in
> /usr/local/nagios/share/images/logos and my hostextinfo.cfg
> is up to date with .gif and .gd2 files. What changed?
The format for definitions. If you provide detail we can tell you
exactly.
--
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety''
Benjamin Franklin 1775
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting
any issue.
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
