Sorry -- misread what you sent. Long day here. What didn't Nagios like? That's a perfectly valid config line. If it didn't like it, either you mistyped it, there are other errors, or you aren't running the version of Nagios you think you are.
On Thu, 06 Jul 2006, Pete Shelfo wrote: > Acutally the format you sent me is how I have things setup. I tried > typing in the full path as a test but that did not matter. I sent that > test reference to Jim Perrin as an example of what I had tried. > > I was looking in the sample configuration files and came across a > statement in nagios.cfg-sample file: > > # Extended host/service info definitions are now stored along with > # other object definitions: > #cfg_file=/usr/local/nagios/etc/hostextinfo.cfg > #cfg_file=/usr/local/nagios/etc/serviceextinfo.cfg > > Have the image locations changed in the new versions? I tried add the > cfg_file=/usr/local/nagios/etc/hostextinfo.cfg statement to my > nagios.cfg file but nagios did not like the command. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Morris, Patrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2006 5:32 PM > To: Pete Shelfo > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [Nagios-users] Nagios Logo Issues > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Pete Shelfo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2006 1:35 PM > > To: Morris, Patrick > > Cc: [email protected] > > Subject: RE: [Nagios-users] Nagios Logo Issues > > > > Thanks for your response. > > > > I have the images loaded in > > /usr/local/nagios/share/images/logos which is the correct location. > > > > I have tried many different types of images and have even > > downloaded the new image pack so that rules out corruption. > > I have about 15 different images reference and none of them work. > > > > I don't have any broken images to check the URL on. All > > hosts have no graphics similar to a fresh install. > > > > The statusmap.cgi does show a graphic - it is just the > > unknown question mark for every host I have. > > > > A fresh install of Nagios looks this way so I believe the > > Nagios or Apache is not even looking at the graphics - I just > > can't tell why. > > Well, that narrows it down considerably. Hadn't figured out 'til now > that you were saying it's not even trying to show your logos. > > If that's the case, then it's definitely a Nagios configuration issue. > > I just went backed and looked at a previous message you sent Jim Perrin > on this subject, and your icon_image and statusmap_image definitions are > definitely not right. Just use the filename, instead of the entire > path. Assuming Nagios was compiled to use the HTML path you think is > correct, that's all you need. > > To use the example you sent: > > Incorrect: > > define hostextinfo{ > host_name servername > icon_image /usr/local/nagios/share/images/logos/win40.gif > statusmap_image /usr/local/nagios/share/images/logos/win40.gd2 > } > > > Correct: > > define hostextinfo{ > host_name servername > icon_image win40.gif > statusmap_image win40.gd2 > } > > > This e-mail is intended solely for the person or entity to which it is > addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. Any > review, dissemination, copying, printing or other use of this e-mail by > persons or entities other than the addressee is prohibited. If you have > received this e-mail in error, please contact the sender immediately and > delete the material from any computer. > > -- Patrick Morris Snapfish/HP 303 Second Street Suite 500, South Tower San Francisco, CA 94107 (415) 979-3727 Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Nagios-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
