John P. Rouillard wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Ugo Bellavance writes: >> Hendrik Baecker wrote: >>> Hi, >>>
<snip> > > Apply the patch mentioned in: > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.network.nagios.user/19511/focus=19511 > > and see if: > > > define servicedependency { > > use defaults > dependent_servicegroup_name NRPE_dep > > service_description NRPE > host_name SELF > > } > > Don't know it it will work, but it seems like it should from the > description. > > > Alternatively do what I do. Create a servicedependency.cfg file that > is created by a script that parses the objects.cache file. so to > update: > > clear/empty servicedependency.cfg > > reload nagios > > wait until objects.cache is updated > > parse objects.cache for all the host/service pairs in the NRPE_dep > servicegroup > > generate: > define servicedependency{ > dependent_host_name example > dependent_service_description (all services from NRPE_dep > for host example) > host_name example > service_description NRPE > ... > } > and put them into servicedependency.cfg > > reload nagios to load the now non-empty servicedependency.cfg file. > > > Definitely a pain. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null > I'll think I'll try to find a router or firewall in front of it on which I could do a test that could be a dependency. Is there plan to correct this? Ugo ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Nagios-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
