I agree that it is a very good to have both, so if anyone has any good ideas on this then please send them this way....
-h Hari Sekhon vex wrote: > On 10/13/06, Hari Sekhon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> good question, it's sometimes more important to know what services are >> down, since you may not remember what that hostname actually does (or it >> could have loads of services on it that you may not be able to remember >> everything that isn't working). >> >> I would also like to consider doing this actually. How should I got >> about >> this? >> >> If I don't put in a check command in the host definition, will I >> continue >> to receive service down notifications and not host down notifications? > > If you don't define a check command in the host definition you have > found a good workaround to manage your (my) problem. But for several > (boring) reasons I would like to have both the notifications for hosts > and services ... and I'm very afraid that's not possible, is it? > > A. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
