> Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 14:00:32 -0500 > From: Curt Shaffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] auto-detecting of new hosts, routers > etc... > To: Nagios Users mailinglist <nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain > > On Sat, 2006-10-21 at 18:19 +0200, Hugo van der Kooij wrote: > > On Sat, 21 Oct 2006, root root wrote:
> I have used nmap to Nagios with some success. I have been thinking about > how to automate this but I keep seeing potential issues like rogue > devices or adding services that I don't care to monitor. Plus I just > don't like the idea of a program overwriting my configs without my > concent when it comes to this. I'm looking at modifying how it works to > be a bit more functional for this need. One thing that a lot of new > monitoring systems have is auto discovery and I think it will be a good > addition to Nagios to keep it as one of the best. It may work fine for > you so give it a look. > > http://www.nagiosexchange.org/Configuration.40.0.html?&tx_netnagext_pi1[p_view]=147&tx_netnagext_pi1[page]=10%3A10 > > HTH > > Curt Thank you for information about nmap2nagios. I will try it. I think it is the second good method (the first is using CDP based software). I wonder how administrators with frequently changed large network (about 3000 hosts) solve this problem? Maybe somebody wrote useful script for it? ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
