Giles Coochey wrote: > I thought about this when writing my post on this particular thread, but > then thought - how do I find out that the host has recovered from its > downtime? > Is this not the defined point of host checks?
When the host check detects that the host is up again, then service checks can resume. > I suspect that it is through service checks. > host checks check if the host is up service checks check if a specific service is up > If anything perhaps a servicedown_check_frequency parameter for service > templates would be a better option? > that's actually not a bad idea, but I can't understand why we would want to check on a service that must by definition be down if the host it sits on is down? How can a service be up if the computer is switched off or unplugged from the network? (or completely firewalled to not respond or whatever) The service check would have to fail in that case, I don't see how any active service check could succeed if a host does not respond. There are very few and rares circumstances that I can think of like a service being attached to a hostname but not actually being on that host, I have had that situation myself, but didn't support it as a good reason for this because actually the service should just be moved to the host it is on or otherwise separated from that host that it is not really on. -h ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
