HI Marc, On Fri, 5 Oct 2007, Marc Powell wrote:
> > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nagios-users- >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ivan Fetch >> Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2007 10:41 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: [Nagios-users] Switching to passive checks instead of active >> ones? >> >> Hello, >> >> >> I'm wondering whether anyone has used send_nsca as a primary >> "transport" for service checks, and has any experience and >> recommendations? > > > I can't talk about writing what essentially appears to be a mini-nagios > to execute plugins on remote hosts but we're using send_nsca to submit > ~4,000 checks every 5 minutes to two central nagios boxen (distributed > architecture) and it's worked great for many years. > Are most of your 4000 uses made up of hosts sending results to your two Nagios boxes, or the two Nagios boxes cross-sending results to one-another? Are you wrapping your checks to be able to use plugins as-is, or do you have plugins which directly call send_nsca? Last but not least, how do you trigger your checks on your hosts, in cron? Thanks for taking the time to reply, Ivan. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Nagios-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
