There is an option to Optionally require a password for clients by changing the 'password' option in the [Settings] section Please see below for example of the file:
[Settings] ;# OBFUSCATED PASSWORD ; This is the same as the password option but here you can store the password in an obfuscated manner. ; *NOTICE* obfuscation is *NOT* the same as encryption, someone with access to this file can still figure out the ; password. Its just a bit harder to do it at first glance. ;obfuscated_password=Jw0KAUUdXlAAUwASDAAB ; ;# PASSWORD ; This is the password (-s) that is required to access NSClient remotely. If you leave this blank everyone will be able to access the daemon remotly. ;password=secret-password ; ;# ALLOWED HOST ADDRESSES ; This is a comma-delimited list of IP address of hosts that are allowed to talk to the all daemons. ; If leave this blank anyone can access the deamon remotly (NSClient still requires a valid password). ; The syntax is host or ip/mask so 192.168.0.0/24 will allow anyone on that subnet access ;allowed_hosts=127.0.0.1/32 ; ;# USE THIS FILE ; Use the INI file as opposed to the registry if this is 0 and the use_reg in the registry is set to 1 ; the registry will be used instead. use_file=1 Exactly what should I do here? Just change the portion that says (password=WHATEVER I WANT IT TO BE HERE)? Very Respectfully, Christy M. New 1(404)327-6490 American Cancer Society Corporate IT-NHO NOC Network Infrastructure Engineer ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Nagios-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
